"Don't part with your dreams - when they are gone you may still exist but you will have ceased to live" - Mark Twain

"Do you know that this blog wouldn't exist if it wasn't for you being here to read it!?" - Bobby Gill
Showing posts with label Lloyds Bank. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lloyds Bank. Show all posts

Tuesday, 20 November 2012

Corporate Scam Calls - Please Confirm Your Personal Details


Corporates make it easy for scammers by making these types of calls as well.  Ever had a call from someone claiming to be from your Bank asking you to verify your details then getting arse-y when you refuse?

Even those with legitimate reasons to calls have poor phone manners and protocol.

Companies like HMRC use witheld and blocked numbers and Banks like HBOS hire third parties to contact you, that aren't transparent either.
Let them get arse-y, upset, offended, annoyed - as they have called you randomly and asked for private information to usually get money for themselves.  They may or may not be legitimate but don't take the risk.
With Governments, Councils, HMRC, Corporates 'losing', 'selling' and 'sharing' your personal details on a regular basis it is pretty easy for a scammer to get hold of them too.


For example: The AA called me and asked me to renew cover.

TIP: I asked for the cheapest rate (usually reserved for NEW customers by most companies) and it was 30% less. So remember to cancel any automatic renewals and re-negotiate ALL your contracts, insurance policies etc annually.

Then she asked me to confirm and provide my credit card details,  I refused.
She said she could prove that she was from the AA by providing breakdown details etc.
I explained that companies sell information and 'lose' it all the time.
She did not give her return call number saying I would not get back through to her.  I ended the call. Another third party commission call centre?

You may have received similar calls from mobile phone companies claiming to be your main provider, having 'acquired' your telephone number, network details and personal info from someone working at Orange/Vodaphone/O2/Carphone Warehouse etc.

For example: Someone called claiming they were from Orange and my handset was due an upgrade. Although quite convincing, his story was only about 99% accurate.  When I did call Orange, they said it wasn't them.

For example: People contacted me from Bank of Scotland saying they worked for HBOS. When contacting HBOS, the Bank denied they worked for them, even though they had provided my personal information.
Note that Banks sometimes actively hire third parties to work for them but do not acknowledge it!

Scammers are con artists who work on convincing you that they are truthful and honest, hence taking advantage of your trust and good human nature.

The BEST policy is do NOT trust anyone claiming to be from a Company - unless you are expecting a call from them and then contact them back yourself!


- I now make it good practice to not answer blocked, unknown or with-held numbers.
- If on answering, it's an automated message that is played, immediately hang up.
- Don't call back if you do not know what the call is about.
- Take the name of the person, usually they refuse to give their last name and contact number anyway.
- Then google the number to find out if it is linked to their official site.

For example: I got a call from Barclays Fraud Department from an unknown number, with a automated voicemail leaving a return number to call.  I could not find reference to this number anywhere!
Even worse it was a legitimate call (from an unknown number) about an important matter, which I found out from the Bank later.  They set themselves up to fail and appear untrustworthy.

This is why you should not trust anyone that calls you and asks to verify your personal details - if they have any sense (which corporates are lacking) they would not ask for it, instead asking you to call them back on a legitimate number that you can find on their correspondence or official websites.

It's also good to have recording device on hand, as you may have found through experience that Government, Council and Corporate employees have a tendency to 'lie' or not tell the whole truth when asked simple questions that deviate from their standard script.

If it's important, they will write to you.

Also note on letters, when dealing with big companies, always write to the Registered office address via recorded delivery to the person named on the letter. They sometimes try to hide behind PO Boxes but must publish the recorded office details.

Below is an example about a BT phone scam going on at the moment.

Phone scammers often pose as staff of companies, government departments or financial institutions as a means of fooling people into handing over their personal details. While this particular instance of the scam targets UK residents, criminals may use similar tactics to steal information from phone consumers in other parts of the world.

While telecommunications companies may well call their customers to query an unpaid account, they are unlikely to attempt to prove the legitimacy of the call by disconnecting the line. If you do receive a suspect call, do not provide the caller with any personal or financial details. If you are unsure about a call, the safest course of action is to:
- Ask for the caller's name and department details and then terminate the call.
- Find a legitimate contact number for the company either in a bill or other official documentation or a telephone directory. (Don't use a contact number provided by the caller).
- Call the company and ask to speak to the original caller by name.

This strategy should effectively derail any scam attempts and also allow you to deal with the issue in the event that the call was actually legitimate.

Bobby

==========

"BT Unpaid Bill Phone Scam Warning

Outline
Message warns that scammers posing as UK telecommunications company BT staff are tricking people into revealing their bank or credit card details by claiming that their phone service will be disconnected if they do not pay an overdue bill immediately.


Brief Analysis
The information in the warning message is factual. Such scams have been occurring in the UK for several years and a number of UK residents have already lost money to the fraudsters.


Subject: BT phone scam

PLEASE PASS ON TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY.

The new telephone 'scam' has arrived.

I received a call from a 'representative' of BT, informing me that he was disconnecting me because of an unpaid bill. He demanded payment immediately of £31.00, or it would be £118.00 to re-connect at a later date.

The guy wasn't even fazed when I told him I was with Virgin Media, allegedly VM have to pay BT a percentage for line rental!

I asked the guy's name - the very 'English' John Peacock with a very 'African' accent - & phone number - 0800 0800 152.

Obviously the fella realized I wasn't believing his story, so offered to demonstrate that he was from BT. I asked how & he told me to hang up & try phoning someone - he would disconnect my phone to prevent this.

AND HE DID!!
My phone was dead - no engaged tone, nothing - until he phoned me again.

Very pleased with himself, he asked if that was enough proof that he was with BT. I asked how the payment was to be made & he said credit card, there & then.

I said that I didn't know how he'd done it, but I had absolutely no intention of paying him, I didn't believe his name or that he worked for BT.

He hung up.
Did 1471 & phoned his fictitious 0800 number – not recognised.

I phoned the police to let them know, I wasn't the first! It's only just started apparently but it is escalating.

Their advice was to let as many people know by word of mouth of this scam. The fact that the phone does go off would probably convince some people it's real, so please let as many friends & family aware of this.

This is good but not that clever. He gave the wrong number - it should have been 0800 800152 which takes you through to BT Business. The cutting off of the line is very simple , he stays on the line with the mute button on and you can't dial out - but he can hear you trying. (This is because the person who initiates a call is the one to terminate it). When you stop trying he cuts off and immediately calls back.

You could almost be convinced! The sad thing is that it is so simple that it will certainly fool the elderly and vulnerable.

Obviously, if this scam is real, once they have your credit/debit card details, there is nothing to stop them cleaning out your account.


Detailed Analysis
This warning, which circulates via email and social media posts, claims that scammers are posing as representatives of UK telecommunications giant BT in order to trick phone users into handing over their financial information.


Beware of scammers posing as BT staff who demand immediate payment for a supposed unpaid bill According to the message, a scammer calls a potential victim and identifies himself as a BT staff member before demanding that a supposed unpaid bill be paid immediately lest the phone be disconnected. If the potential victim seems doubtful, the scammer offers to "prove" he is really from BT by temporarily disconnecting the phone. The scammer then uses a simple trick to make the victim think that the phone has really been cut off before calling back to demand an immediate payment. The scammer ask the victim to hang up and try calling someone else but simply stays on the line which restricts outgoing calls. Because the outgoing call cannot be made, some users may then assume that their phone has really been disconnected and pay up as requested to avoid a hefty reconnection fee.

The information in the warning email is factual. Such scams have indeed been occurring in the UK and a number of UK residents have already lost money to these fraudsters. BT has published the following notice on its website warning customers about the scam:
Please be aware of the following:

Fraudsters, pretending to be from various phone companies, have been calling people on the pretence that there is an outstanding bill and threatening to disconnect their line immediately if they do not pay the bill straight away.

The fraudsters have been pretending to "cut off" the customer. Worried about having their line cut off, some people have been persuaded into giving the fraudsters their bank account details.

The police are investigating and BT Security is looking into incidents where the fraudsters have claimed to be from BT.

Whilst BT does have debt handling procedures which may involve calling customers, BT never carries out disconnections during the call by way of proof.

We advise customers never to give out any banking details over the phone unless they are absolutely certain who they are dealing with.

If there is any doubt at all, a BT employee will be able to give the customer their employee ID number and an 0800 number to call, where the customer can check that they are who they say they are. The customer can also check their identity by calling 0800 800 150.

Beware of similar phone numbers. Fraudsters may for example offer a number which has an extra zero - 0800 0800 xxx has been used by fraudsters - it is not the same as 0800 800 xxx.
UK communications regulator OfCom has also posted a warning to consumers about the scam:
Fraudsters are currently phoning consumers claiming to be from BT or Ofcom. They claim that the consumer’s telephone line needs digital upgrade work. This, they say, will cost £6 and if it isn’t paid within 10 days the consumer’s phone line will be cut off.

In some cases, the fraudster will claim that the line needs testing and they will temporarily disconnect it. When the consumer tries to make an outgoing call they are unable to do so. This is simply because the fraudster is still on the line meaning no outbound calls can be made.

This is a scam. Ofcom and BT have alerted the relevant authorities for investigation."

Article written by Brett M. Christensen Hoax-Slayer
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/bt-unpaid-bill-phone-scam.shtml

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Bank Frauds in the News - $43 Trillion Financial Fraud Lawsuit in US - Racketeering and Money Laundering


Iceland dealt with it's banking and financial problems and the economy is recovering.  The Irish are taking mass action against the banks. Even the US have started civil lawsuits against racketeering and Money Laundering now - but they're trying to keep it quiet.


Censored: Banks Fraud in the News - $43 Trillion Financial Fraud Lawsuit and CNBC Executive’s Children Murdered - coincidence or not!?

Do you watch/read the news? Do you believe it isn't censored…?
In that case you will have heard one of the big CNBC related news stories.

Not the one about the Vice President of CNBC Digital having his children murdered, which is the daily fodder of stories that media like to feed people that enjoy this kind of curious behaviour. Even though it was horrific and not deserving of anyone, especially young children: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223972/Krim-murder-Brave-year-old-girl-tried-fight-killer-nanny.html

But the other BIG story I'm referring to is about the $43 trillion dollar lawsuit that CNBC had published earlier that same day.  It was a Press Release that they had run on their website, I know it was there as I had a glance last week and saved the link to read later. CNBC Published the article on Thursday and it had disappeared within 48 hours! Now who says news isn't censored!?

This is the link where the article WAS:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49555671/Major_Banks_Governmental_Officials_and_Their_Comrade_Capitalists_Targets_of_Spire_Law_Group_LLP_s_Racketeering_and_Money_Laundering_Lawsuit_Seeking_Return_of_43_Trillion_to_the_United_States_Treasury

A copy of the deleted article/press release is available here to read:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111797302

View the 858 Page Lawsuit here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111799801

And other people that notice the anomaly and discussing the coincidence:
http://wtfrly.com/2012/10/27/cnbc-curiously-removes-article-on-43-trillion-financial-fraud-lawsuit-after-executives-kids-murdered-in-new-york-nanny-case/

I'm not saying there is a link but don't you think it curious that it happened!?

-----

Elsewhere in the World....


Do what Iceland did and kick out the corrupt Government plebs and fraudulent bankers!


The Irish have also started their cases



Bankers in America know their time has come with the latest lawsuit and it looks like it will be the UK's biggest next, with Lloyds TSB management and their Halifax Bank of Scotland partners next.

Do you think your Bank has defrauded you?

Well, with so much overwhelming evidence (or lack of defence offered), moral and financial bankruptcy, government bailouts, whilst they take money from 'Dear Doris' - the answer is yes and you can find out easily by asking them a few simple questions.

Of course if you're happy with them defrauding you, then carry on as normal. After all is Ignorance is Bliss!

If you want to know for sure then you can send them a letter requesting a certified copy of your supposed contracts and proof of Bank funds, to confirm your suspicions.

Your only obligation to yourself is to send the letter, see what answers you get back - then follow up with legal action (if you can afford) or at least publish the information online if there is something untoward or shady about any misdirection and refusal to provide answers or documents that you have a right to!

Yes that's right - Banks refuse to send documents either because they don't have them or because they believe they can get away with it. Is it time you showed them that people aren't going to take any more fraud and lies?

Isn't it time you took a stand too?

Leave a comment below and I'll send you a copy of the letter to find out if you have been taken for a ride.

Monday, 25 October 2010

Lloyds (HBOS) Gambled and Lost - Next Centre Point London

Find out where the Banks gambled your money and what they're doing to get some of it back at the cost to other businesses and people! Do you trust your countries Bankers to be HONEST?



11 October 2010: Trust me I'm a banker
By Mark Daly BBC Scotland Investigations Correspondent (Full story: http://www.bbc.co.uk)

Two years ago this week, Scotland's once-proud banking history was ripped to shreds.

Facing total ruin, Royal Bank of Scotland was rescued by the government. Halifax Bank of Scotland had to be sold off to Lloyds, which in turn had to be bailed out by the taxpayer.

In 2009, RBS paid £1.3bn in bonuses, while Lloyds paid a reported £200m. Both were in the red at the time

We wanted to know more. Remember, RBS is 83% owned by the taxpayer, Lloyds 41% - so it could be argued that we're entitled to know what they're up to.

"Bankers are paid much more than executives in any other walk of business life. The idea that you have to pay these people stratospheric sums of money...underwritten by the taxpayer is offensive." - Economist Will Hutton

"Just remember one thing, the City is full of greedy, ruthless, clever people and they will do what they can to line their pockets with no regard of the impact it has on society." - Former trader and best selling author of "Cityboy" Geraint Anderson

Mr Tate, who was the highest earning Lloyds director last year with £1.8m, said: "There are a whole lot of people, myself included, who would love to get the kind of return on their investment that the taxpayer has made into this bank. They've made an investment that is making money. If you could come up with me, with an investment in the infrastructure which would have returned more for the taxpayers, I'm all ears."

(What a Banker!)


    m resort las vegas hbos
Tuesday 12 October 2010: HBOS loses millions on Vegas casino
(Full Story: www.guardian.co.uk)

Value of state-owned Lloyds' overseas portfolio questioned after Penn National Gaming paid $230m for $860m debt

Penn National Gaming paid $230.5m for around $860m owed to HBOS, which included $700m the bank loaned to M Resort Photograph: Alise O'Brien

Lloyds Banking Group, the partially state-owned lender, has lost more than $500m (£317m) on loans to M Resort Spa Casino in Las Vegas – the second massive financial hit the bank has taken in America in as many months.

News of the deal has started attracting attention to the value of Lloyds's overseas portfolio, much of which it acquired during the unpopular takeover of HBOS is 2008. Market watchers had previously attributed most of the woe associated with that acquisition to lending within HBOS's UK corporate division, headed by Peter Cummings.

Penn National Gaming, a US gambling group, paid $230.5m for about $860m owed to HBOS International, which included $700m the bank loaned to M Resort plus another $160m loan that HBOS had acquired from MGM Resorts at an undisclosed price.

The debt sale comes two months after it emerged that HBOS International was set to lose "tens of millions of pounds" from dealings with another US client, Sea Island, the exclusive Georgia holiday retreat that filed for bankruptcy in August. In that case, court documents said Sea Island was unable to pay back close to $600m in debts owed to a consortium of banks that included HBOS, which were taken out to fund an ambitious expansion plan. The company said it planned to sell its coastal resorts to investment funds Oaktree Capital Management and Avenue Capital Group in a $197.5m.

The mounting US losses at HBOS are thought to have been incurred in the division previously run by Colin Matthew, a former HBOS board member whose responsibilities included the bank's international business. He retired from the newly formed group in January 2009 with a pension entitlement of £416,000 a year, having been paid £652,000 in 2008 and £905,000 in 2007.

Lloyds declined to comment on individual impairments, although the group is thought to have already written down the value of the M Resort loans. Following the sale of HBOS to Lloyds, the former HBOS international and UK corporate businesses have all been rolled into a single Lloyds division, making it difficult to analyse where the major losses have been incurred.

One analyst said: "There is an idea that much of the financial crisis was down to a few bad apples. That is a simplification. It has lots to do with the organisational structure of banks. People are not incentivised to sit back and call the cycle."

Lloyds has been winding down or selling HBOS-owned assets ever since acquiring Britain's largest mortgage lender. The acquisition, which was encouraged by the UK government, helped Lloyds book losses of £6.3bn last year and pushed the shares, which closed yesterday at 72.65p, down to 19p.



Towering problems: Centre Point in London13th October 2010: High Court reprieve for Centre Point owner in survival battle with Lloyds banking
(Full Story: www.dailymail.co.uk)

The owner of the Centre Point tower in London won a reprieve in its battle for survival with Lloyds Banking Group. London's High Court granted Targetfollow two weeks to secure investment, despite efforts by Lloyds to force it into administration over £700million of debt. The property developer cannot meet repayments on the loan or repay it in full because the value of its estate tumbled in the financial crisis.

But the group claims it has come up with a number of viable ways to restructure the debt - only to see them rejected by Lloyds.

The part-nationalised bank, 41per cent owned by the taxpayer after a multi-billion pound bailout by the state, wants to seize and sell the properties to recoup some of its money.


It has raised fears within the commercial property industry of a fire-sale of assets and double-dip in prices as banks seeking to unwind toxic loans handed out during the boom years from undermining the recovery.

Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland, which is 84 per cent owned by the state, are sitting on more than a third of the £250billion of outstanding UK property debt.

Many of the rotten loans at Lloyds were approved by Peter Cummings, the former corporate chief of Bank of Scotland, which Lloyds acquired by it bought HBOS in 2008.

'Every week that passes is detrimental to the value of the assets,' he said. Lloyds values Targetfollow's estate at just £450million. The company claims it is worth nearer £680million.

The judge adjourned the case until October 25 at the earliest.

Naghshineh, an Iranian businessman, last month said: 'The whole UK property industry is watching the situation very closely.

'Any indication that [Lloyds] is starting a process of offloading [assets] at fire-sale prices will hit the property market very hard indeed, just as the recovery is underway.'



Friday 22 October 2010: Lloyds to go ahead with administration of Centre Point owner Targetfollow
(Full Story - http://uk.finance.yahoo.com)

Lloyds Banking Group is preparing to push ahead with administration proceedings against the owner of London landmark Centre Point despite the company claiming it has secured a £150m rescue cash investment.

Targetfollow, led by founder Ardeshir Naghshineh, issued a statement yesterday saying it had agreed terms with a "high-quality institutional consortium" to invest £150m in the business.

However, according to sources close to talks, Lloyds, which is owed more than £700m by Targetfollow, does not support the proposals and still plans to go ahead with a High Court hearing next week about whether the property company is placed into administration.

Targetfollow is breaching covenants on its debts and Lloyds must approve any capital injection, however it is understood that the bank believes the consortium's terms are "not feasible" and would require it to take writedowns. The offer is a "long way" from what the bank considers appropriate, sources said. Lloyds declined to comment.

Targetfollow is due in court next week after it was granted two weeks to find a rescue investor earlier this month.

The consortium's proposed £150m aid package would be used to acquire a portion of the debt from Lloyds and to provide working capital to Targetfollow. Mr Naghshineh said: "I believe that this consortium addresses the issues that the bank has raised with the company in the past 12 months, and will pave the way for the bank and the company to move on from what has been a very difficult time."

Lloyds is managing about £30bn of problem property debt. The downturn in the sector led to the bank making damaging writedowns during the financial crisis. Latest accounts from Uberior Ventures, HBOS's property joint venture arm, show its investments fell in value by £590m to £345m last year.


Sunday, 25 April 2010

Banks, Solicitors, Receivers, Ex-Tenants

What do you do when banks, government and dishonest people are busy trying to bend you over and screw you in the ass? Take a stand and say NO!

Then see what happens when the hunters become the hunted as I think it's time to declare that Fair Hunting season is now Open!


It has been an interesting year so far. I've had challenges with tyrannical banks (as they are technically bankrupt!) their Nazi solicitors who don't stand for justice or what is right, only doing as the 'system' says - and Receivers claiming to represent individuals on false pretenses and with a lack of loyalty to the person they owe the care and duty.
  • If you have issues with the Bank of Scotland, Bank Receivers, Bank Solicitors and want to share your experiences and information - then contact me now. Experience and knowledge shared will show who is acting honourably and what you can do in such circumstances when the system judges you guilty before being given a fair trial. You are also welcome to repost this information on any other forum with a link back to here.
Let's not forget the two ex-tenants with outstanding rent; when asked to confirm how much they had paid and to settle the difference, they decided to make a spurious counter-claim instead. Why provide the info and claim fault when you can lie and see how much you can make - blame those where there's blame (sic), there's a claim ads and lawyers. The crazy thing is that the individuals in question are the prime suspects in a criminal investigation for vandalism, upset with the Court Summons they smashed a window where they thought my office was - the CCTV and new cameras came in handy eventually. There is such a thing as justice, no matter how or when it is delivered.

Then to finish off, a property that had been turned into a drug den that was then trashed by the police as well and is now being cleaned up (I've never seen guys that happy as they cleared rubbish, must be something in the spring air). So at least someone has been happy this month.

  • Should any of the cases not be dealt with satisfactorily, then All documents and communication with banks, courts, tenants etc. will be made available public record along with names of individuals, addresses and proven facts to prevent this happening to other people. 
 If you're prepared to say or do anything then be prepared to stand by it - as your future depends on your reputation and the world is getting smaller (and some of you reading will be getting worried if I'm talking about you!)  You don't mess with someone with nothing to lose, so what's your loss/gain risk ratio?


With Banks not being sympathetic to customers or wanting to help, whilst milking every penny that they can. Having received the taxpayers money from the government they want even more back from the people as well - how many times over do they want us to pay money on fake debts?  Whilst those in Government are fighting over who gets to take and spend more of our money in the future (maybe we should give the Liberal Democrats a try, as they don't have a track record in screwing citizens and people over, yet!)

Who stands a chance to win against fictional corporations, legal systems and liars? Well the honest souls who do what is right and tell the truth of course. After all, words are powerful and the truth rings true, as opposed to the hollow sound that a fraudulent story makes. Bring it on... 

[Rant over]

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

Eric Daniels the CEO of the Lloyds Banking Group doesn’t answer questions

Above the law? An article about CEO Eric Daniels and buying a bankrupt HBOS for more than the pound t was worth. Share the info, find out where and how they're spending the country's money and screwing the nation for it.

Bobby


Author: Andrew Withers, January 14th, 2010

Don’t take this the wrong way, but I actually settled down to watch BBC Parliament yesterday. It was the Finance Select Committee asking questions of Eric Daniels the CEO of the Lloyds Banking Group. With a cup of black coffee and a sandwich, I listened with opened mouthed incredulity at what was being said.

Now Mr Daniels I have to say deserves his job. Not for his business acumen (that is in severe doubt) but for a sphinx like demeanour and general coolness under fire that was quite impressive.

However let’s get down to brass tacks. HBOS was a basket case when the Treasury approached Lloyds, which was in relatively fine fettle. It was clear from the questioning from a Labour MP, whose name currently escapes me, that the Government and Treasury had got to the stage were HBOS was getting to the point where a decision had to be made not to accept any further business. That would have precipitated another catastrophic run like Northern Rock.

Daniels was constantly pressed on whether he was told this information directly by the Treasury. He did not give a straight answer. He repeated a mantra that ‘he was made aware of the serious nature of the situation’. Being a simple sort of lad, this seemed to me to require an answer- yes or no. The Treasury appears not to have passed this information on and Daniels did not ask the question.

We appear to have two sides not applying the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Stupid), everybody being too busy being very clever and urbane whilst playing with other peoples’ money. The Treasury with ours, Daniels with Lloyds shareholders.

Then came the point of due diligence. Despite there being ‘a serious situation’, this is where HBOS was about to close is doors to new business (bankrupt) Daniels and his team did ‘ the appropriate amount’ of due diligence (prior legal briefing) this was admitted as being around 25%-50% of what was required in the ‘time allowed’. Lloyds then ‘valued’ the shares of HBOS at £2.38 a share and Daniels admitted in making this valuation to shareholders. He omitted though to mention the small fact that HBOS was being propped up with a Treasury loan of £25.4 bn.

The Banking Act 2009 made it possible for the Treasury and Bank of England to keep secret funding assistance in cases where financial stability may be put at risk – introduced in the wake of the run on Northern Rock.

As I said I am a very simple sort of person. It appears to me that HBOS was bust, and Lloyds could have picked up the whole caboodle for £1, as did ING buying Barings after Nick Leeson and the Directors had finished it off.

Who hood-winked who here? Daniels was adamant that nobody from the Treasury had hoodwinked him, and he had not hoodwinked his shareholders.

It is clear what Brown, Darling and the Treasury were getting out of this deal, a get out of jail free card that staved off the collapse of the Labour Government and possibly the end of the Labour Movement. However, what did Daniels hope to get out of this ? That is the question I would have asked. His reputation is tainted, and why he has not been removed by the shareholders is a mystery to me.

Unfortunately Daniels was saved by the inane twitterings of Sally Keeble MP, who asked a sixth form question about why small businesses cannot get loans from Lloyds. Watching her ask a question was like watching teenager who wanted to be taken seriously in a room full of adults.

She must have been asleep when it was being explained that her Government had induced a solvent bank, to take on a bankrupt bank, propped up by a £25.4bn of tax payers’ money at £2.38 a share and that deal had rendered Lloyds insolvent. With us as the taxpayer owning a large chunk of the combined group.

The only thing saved here was the Governments neck. The rest of us have been hood-winked, as have our children and grandchildren who have to pay to sort this out in higher taxes and reduced standard of living.

‘Too big to fail’ is a corrupt way to view ‘protected’ industry such as banking. HBOS should have been placed into administration and broken up into viable smaller regional banks. Each with a remit to indulge in retail and commercial finance. Brown and Darling sought to protect a collapsed monopoly to save face. Hence the chicanery of the Banking Act 2009

This Rotten Parliament has only months to run, it should be consigned to the dustbin of History.
Source: www.economicvoice.com